EDITORIAL
As
I do from time to time, I'm taking a rest, and handing over the editorial page
to Maureen Neath, who has some important comments to
make in respect of the proposed
Neil Southworth
(Editor)
The
As a resident of Duxbury for over 30 years,
I was saddened when I learned that the
Permission
has now been granted and the road scheme will go ahead despite the efforts of
hundreds of local people, the Duxbury Keep the Peace Campaign and the Chorley
Ramblers’ Group, all of whom appreciate that building a road, a section
of which runs through Duxbury Woods, will cause an intrusive visual impact and
harm the landscape especially at the river crossing.
The
findings of the Ecological Assessment section of the Environmental Statement,
based on existing information, much of which was supplied by the Chorley &
District Natural History Society, along with a survey undertaken by Penny
Anderson Associates (PAA) between February and July 2000 and again in July
2002, describes the effects that the road will have on Duxbury Woods where much
of the damage will be irreversible, especially in terms of the flora and fauna
showed:
Positive
evidence of the presence of four protected species:
The
bird surveys showed:
Other
species:
Potential
Species Impacts showed a potential loss of a range of common species –
birds, invertebrates, small mammals and lower plants because of loss of
habitat. Likewise, the loss of woodland
habitat will result in the loss of potential nesting and foraging areas for the
breeding birds recorded within the scheme corridor, including species of conservation
concern.
Chorley
Borough Council has acknowledged that “there would be adverse impact
damage” particularly where the proposed road alignment crosses the River
Yarrow at
Mitigation
proposals are well documented, these include:
The
definitive footpath (Footpath 41) will be diverted along a woodland route but
it will cross the road where the proposed road severs the length of the path in
the former Vertex Training Centre. A
small, pedestrian refuge will be provided.
There
is a stated commitment to undertake a management and maintenance plan for a
minimum of five years from completion of the planting work and to inspect the
site at least three times a year for three years following construction. During the same period there is a commitment
to do an annual inspection of the existing woodland trees to determine whether
any secondary effects become apparent.
What
is noticeable by its absence is any commitment to manage, maintain, inspect and
monitor after these stated periods. If
Likewise,
it is essential that, those of us who are concerned about our environment
ensure that as much mitigation as is possible and practical is carried out
prior to commencement of the work and that all mitigation work is implemented
as a minimum and that permission to go ahead with the scheme is conditional
upon this happening.
The views express here are
personal and do not necessarily express the views of the C&DNHS.
Maureen Neath